The article compares the evolution of democracy in Latin America and Asia, contrasting the reactive nature of Latin American democratization during economic crises with the deliberate choice of democracy by economically successful Asian countries. It argues that strong, developmental governments in Asia fostered stability and economic growth, unlike the crisis-driven reforms in Mexico.
The Mexican Senate has dissolved the Judicial Power, concentrating all governmental powers in a single person, paving the way for an authoritarian regime. Despite opposition, the ruling party manipulated electoral results to achieve a qualified majority. This move, viewed as a coup d’état, threatens Mexico’s democracy and individual rights.
Federico Reyes Heroles discusses societal poisoning, comparing it to the insidious effects of fascism in postwar Holland and the pervasive negativity in contemporary Mexican politics. He critiques inflammatory rhetoric by officials, the normalization of extreme divisive language, and the consequential erosion of societal values, highlighting a need for collective consolation and understanding.
The mobilizations against the AMLO-Sheinbaum proposal to overhaul the judiciary highlight broad rejection from society, investors, international organizations, and the media. Despite the government’s efforts to adjust voting thresholds in their favor, significant protests by judiciary workers and students underscore deep societal distrust toward the government’s intentions, revealing its underlying weaknesses.
AMLO’s conflict with Mexico’s Judiciary, marked by radical anti-Supreme Court actions and vocal opposition, is stirring political and economic instability. Amidst capital flight, cartel gains, and strained US relations, his final term’s aggression aims to reshape power dynamics, reflecting deep-rooted party fanaticism and looming threats of recession and neoliberal backlash.
Luis Rubio argues that Mexico’s recent elections, where López Obrador gained substantial support, do not signify a regime change but a return to the old political system. Despite promises of democracy, the President’s actions have undermined democratic institutions, leading to a powerful presidency reminiscent of post-revolutionary caudillismo.
A diverse gathering, including students and professionals, rallied on Sunday at the Angel of Independence to defend judicial independence in Mexico. They emphasize the need for impartial, professional judges and the importance of maintaining the separation of powers, amid broader concerns about democracy and rising activism. “Times are changing,” echoing Bob Dylan’s lyrics.
Luis Rubio critiques Mexico’s political evolution over decades, highlighting fragmented governance, weak institutions, and the challenges President López Obrador’s successor, Claudia Sheinbaum, will face. Despite electoral victories, the country lacks stable structures, risking governance under caudillos and organized crime. Effective institution-building is crucial for future resilience.
Ricardo Pascoe Pierce Mexico is experiencing a severe crisis at the end of six years. The situation is further complicated by the inability of its leading promoters to recognize it. A vignette that unveils this incapacity was López Obrador’s last Government Report. And it is …
Antonio Navalón reflects on the presidency of Andrés Manuel López Obrador, highlighting his consistent transparency about his intentions for Mexico. Despite initial doubts, López Obrador achieved significant changes, often criticized for prioritizing immediate aid over long-term development. The electoral success of his party and the transition to Claudia Sheinbaum’s leadership underscores the enduring influence and controversial legacy of his administration.